https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Structural_design_failures 2026-06-29T14:15:18Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.38.4 https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=1367&oldid=prev 2021-11-21T20:16:22Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 21:16, 21 November 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l14">Line 14:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 14:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of a diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software.  </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of a diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software.  </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the structure was not <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">identified </del>in the validation of the analysis model and was not covered in the code of practice rules.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the structure was not <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">included </ins>in the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Structural modelling process|</ins>validation of the analysis<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">]] </ins>model and was not covered in the code of practice rules.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;/div&gt;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;/div&gt;</div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=1083&oldid=prev 2021-09-07T20:37:52Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 21:37, 7 September 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l6">Line 6:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 6:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">that </del>structural designers in the UK <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">had tended to use </del>Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">; </del>important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly how the panels should be connected<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, were not addressed in the code and hence in many of the designs.  The core issue was that the use of the CP114 Code of Practice was not subject to a validation analysis. The  requirements for the reinforced concrete used in the building were  not all within the scope of the CP114 code</del>.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">many major </ins>structural <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">design deficiencies. Structural </ins>designers in the UK <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">used </ins>Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">validation </ins>question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">and did not address </ins>important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">abot </ins>how the panels should be connected.  </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August 1968, the Report was mainly complete. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">No lengthy legal procedures were used. </del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August 1968, the Report was mainly complete. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">  </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Cleddau.png|thumb|Figure 2  The collapsed Cleddau Bridge]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Cleddau.png|thumb|Figure 2  The collapsed Cleddau Bridge]]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the </del>diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software.  </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">a </ins>diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software.  </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the structure was not identified in the validation of the analysis model.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the structure was not identified in the validation of the analysis model <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">and was not covered in the code of practice rules</ins>.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;/div&gt;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;/div&gt;</div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=985&oldid=prev 2021-08-17T18:54:31Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 19:54, 17 August 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l2">Line 2:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;div style=&quot;width:800px;&quot;&gt;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;div style=&quot;width:800px;&quot;&gt;</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">of the walls and floors </del>consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins>consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed that structural designers in the UK had tended to use Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures; important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly how the panels should be connected, were not addressed in the code and hence in many of the designs.  The core issue was that the use of the CP114 Code of Practice was not subject to a validation analysis. The  requirements for the reinforced concrete used in the building were  not all <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">dwithin </del>the scope of the CP114.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed that structural designers in the UK had tended to use Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures; important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly how the panels should be connected, were not addressed in the code and hence in many of the designs.  The core issue was that the use of the CP114 Code of Practice was not subject to a validation analysis. The  requirements for the reinforced concrete used in the building were  not all <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">within </ins>the scope of the CP114 <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">code</ins>.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August 1968 the Report was mainly complete. No lengthy legal procedures were used.  </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August 1968<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, </ins>the Report was mainly complete. No lengthy legal procedures were used.  </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l14">Line 14:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 14:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of the diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software.  </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of the diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software.  </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">bridge </del>was not identified in the validation of the analysis model.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">structure </ins>was not identified in the validation of the analysis model.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;/div&gt;</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;/div&gt;</div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=984&oldid=prev 2021-08-17T18:51:17Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 19:51, 17 August 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;div<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&gt; </del>style=&quot;width:800px;&quot;</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;div style=&quot;width:800px;&quot;<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&gt;</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=983&oldid=prev 2021-08-17T18:48:57Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 19:48, 17 August 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;div&gt; style=&quot; <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </del>width:800px; &quot;[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>&lt;div&gt; style=&quot;width:800px;&quot;</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=982&oldid=prev 2021-08-17T18:46:58Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 19:46, 17 August 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;div&gt; style=&quot;  width:800px; &quot;</ins>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey near a corner of the building resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion - Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l14">Line 14:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 14:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the bridge was not identified in the validation of the analysis model.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A major issue in the behaviour of the bridge was not identified in the validation of the analysis model.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">&lt;/div></ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=930&oldid=prev 2021-08-11T11:46:04Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:46, 11 August 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey resulted in <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the </del>local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, </del>Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">near a corner of the building </ins>resulted in local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">- </ins>Figure 1. Four people died.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed that structural designers in the UK had tended to use Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures; important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly how the panels should be connected, were not addressed in the code and hence in many of the designs.  The core issue was that the use of the CP114 Code of Practice was not subject to a validation analysis.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed that structural designers in the UK had tended to use Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures; important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly how the panels should be connected, were not addressed in the code and hence in many of the designs.  The core issue was that the use of the CP114 Code of Practice was not subject to a validation analysis<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">. The  requirements for the reinforced concrete used in the building were  not all dwithin the scope of the CP114</ins>.</div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August the Report was mainly complete. No <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">messing about. Get on with the job</del>.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">1968 </ins>the Report was mainly complete. No <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">lengthy legal procedures were used</ins>.  </div></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=925&oldid=prev 2021-08-09T10:40:57Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en-GB"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:40, 9 August 2021</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">gdsgas</del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">=== The Ronan Point Building collapse 1968 ===</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[File:Ronan-poit.png|thumb|300x300px|Figure 1  The collapse at Ronan Point ]]</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The 22 storey Ronan Point building in London was of ‘large panel’ construction i.e. the structure of the walls and floors consisted of large precast concrete wall and floor units with no beams or columns. In 1968, a gas explosion at the 18th storey resulted in the local walls being blown out. The fall of the now unsupported panels directly above the explosion then took away the corner panels below the explosion, Figure 1. Four people died.</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">This was a wake-up call for the need to consider progressive collapse in structural design and resulted in important changes in structural design philosophy.</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">A post-accident investigation into the condition of all UK high-rise large panel buildings showed that structural designers in the UK had tended to use Code of Practice ''CP114: The structural use of reinforced concrete in buildings'' for the technical assessment of large-panel buildings. Many of these designers had not asked the question: “Does CP114 address all the issues that need to be considered for the design of large-panel buildings?” The answer to that question would have been “No!”. CP114 was written mainly for cast-in-situ beam and column structures; important issues for large-panel buildings, particularly how the panels should be connected, were not addressed in the code and hence in many of the designs.  The core issue was that the use of the CP114 Code of Practice was not subject to a validation analysis.</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The 1968 ''[https://archive.org/download/op1268013-1001/op1268013-1001.pdf Report on the inquiry] into the collapse of flats at Ronan Point'' is model of good reporting.  The collapse occurred on 16 May and the Committee first met on 30 May,1968. By the beginning of August the Report was mainly complete. No messing about. Get on with the job.</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">=== The Cleddau Bridge collapse ===</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[File:Cleddau.png|thumb|Figure 2  The collapsed Cleddau Bridge]]</ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">In 1970 a section of a steel box girder bridge intended to span the River Cleddau in Wales collapsed when under construction - Figure 2; four construction workers were killed. While there were other important factors, the analsis modelling used in the design for the structure was inadequate for prediction of the collapse. The main cause of the failure was buckling of the diaphragm at a pier. In order to predict the collapse, a shell element model with non-linear material and non-linear geometry effects should have been used. Such features were difficult to implement in 1970 as compared with the potential of modern software. </ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">A major issue in the behaviour of the bridge was not identified in the validation of the analysis model.</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Iain https://eit.engineers.scot/index.php?title=Structural_design_failures&diff=922&oldid=prev 2021-08-09T10:09:23Z

<p>Created page with &quot;gdsgas&quot;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>gdsgas</div>

Iain