Structural design processes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Design involves the integration of a range of process - see | Design involves the integration of a range of process - see <u>process mapping</u>. | ||
The simple model of: | The simple model of: | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 19 November 2021
Design involves the integration of a range of process - see process mapping.
The simple model of:
Input -----> process -----> outcomes
prompts the observation that deep focus on the quality of the inputs and quality of the processes is critical for achieving successful outcomes. Designers therefore need to work hard to ensure that the inputs and processes that they use are the most appropriate that can be devised in the context.
This principle applies to all context where complex uncertainty is to be addressed.
Models of the design process
Figure 1 shows how, when creating a structure, one starts with a set of requirements that define the performance of the structure. This is transformed by a design process into design output, i.e. into information about what the structure will be and justification for the design decisions.. A construction process then transforms the design output into the physical structure.
A basic model
Figure 2 shows a model of the design process. The 'system model' is information about the stucture being designed and about its context.
The process is not normally linear. 'Review and revise' is at the heart of the process. Iterations may be needed and revisions are made based on continuous review activity,
At the Inception, requirements for the performance of the stucture and for the design process are established and information about, for example, the site is identified.
At Conception, investigations are carried leading to a decisoin about the general form of the structre to be adopted.
At Production, the chosen form of structure is developed to produce drawings and specifications to be passed on to the construction stage. Other outcomes include documents that justify the decisions taken.
Process mapping
The Institution of Structural Egineers publishes a Structural Plan of Work that sets out an overall process for structural engineers working on the design of a building.
The stages in the IStructE Plan of Work are shown in Figure 1.
A process map for structural design based on the IStructE Plan of Work is shown in Table 1.
Risk
A structural collapse can have serious consequences and all structural engineering activities should be treated as being, to some degree, safety critical.
It is important to pay special attention to the requirements of the client but such considerations should not over-ride duty of care to the publc.
Naval architect, Stephen Payne, designer of the Queen Mary 2, said (at a talk given to the Institution of Engineers in Scotland in 2020). "When designing a cruise liner, the regulations represent the starting point for my safety assessment. The Titanic met the then current regulations." Hundreds of people might drown if a passenger liner was lost at sea. There are equivalent risks in structural design e.g. for a long span bridge or the roof of a sports stadium. Use of the principle that the starting point for design should be the regulations should be adopted in all strutural designs. This requires critical thinking by all participants.
Design Programme
A simpler form of the Plan of Work for design is shown in Table 1..
Table 1 Simplified process map for a structural design