Strategies for system planning: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Critical thinking]] | [[Critical thinking]] | ||
Leadership | [[Leadership]] | ||
Communication | Communication | ||
Revision as of 13:35, 9 March 2021
| Papers |
| Strategies
Communication |
| Case Studies
The UK Covid-19 Task Force A successful government project Queensferry Bridge A well managed infrastructure project The development of an optical scanner (p22) How to develop an innovative product |
The verb 'to engineer' is used here to mean 'to use a range of strategies for achieving successful outcomes in situations of complex uncertainty'. Professional engineers will typically engineer the design of an aircraft or a bridge. Busineses are 'engineered' (or 're-engineered'). The strategies used have universal application in complex problem solving. They are not confined to the practice of engineering.
Figure 1 shows some features of an engineered process.
The key issues are competence, i.e. the skills of those inolved and governance, i.e. how responsility, authority and accountabiliy is allocated.
Competence is shown as having two main components:
- Disciplinary expertise i.e. the abilities of those involved to carry out specific tasks. It is common to require expertise from several disciplines
- Ethos - the principles that guide the actions of the participants.
Whereas 'what you know' might be described in term of disciplinary expertise, ethos is 'how you think'. Ethos is a crtical issue in engineered processes.
Critical thinking is shown on the diagram as a subset of ethos but it can also be viewed as aoveraching concept.