Critical thinking: Difference between revisions

From Engineer-it
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
|}
|}
[[File:Athena-2.png|alt=|left|thumb|160x160px|Athena, godess of wisdom]]
[[File:Athena-2.png|alt=|left|thumb|160x160px|Athena, godess of wisdom]]
[[File:Thinker-2.png|left|alt=|thumb|Rodin's thinker]]Critical thinking is directed towards achieving satisfactory outcomes by adopting guiding principles that support the achievement of the outcomes.      
[[File:Thinker-2.png|left|alt=|thumb|Rodin's thinker]]Critical thinking is interpreted here as the use of guiding principles that support the achievement of outcomes.        


Critical thinkers discipline their minds to reduce the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes.                               
Critical thinkers discipline their minds to reduce the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes.                               
Line 33: Line 33:


==== Actions ====
==== Actions ====
*Test proposals, critique, review: see [[Critical thinking#Proposal testing|Proposal testing]] below.
*Test proposals - see [[Critical thinking#Proposal testing|Proposal testing]] below.
*Reflect: question, consult, challenge, be challenged, expect to be challenged :be sceptical about the validity of all information; avoid preconceptions and bias.  
*Reflect: question, review, consult, challenge, be challenged, expect to be challenged, be sceptical about the validity of all information; avoid preconceptions and bias.
*Submit to reason: use logic and evidence to the limits of their potential before making informed judgements.
*Submit to reason: use logic and evidence to the limits of their potential before making informed judgements.
*Use, where appropriate, the Engineer-it [[Chapter 1:Strategies for engineered outcomes|strategies]]
*Use, where appropriate, the Engineer-it [[Chapter 1:Strategies for engineered outcomes|strategies]]

Revision as of 22:21, 2 December 2021

References
Internal links

Engineer-it main page Strategies page

Definitions

Wikipedia

The Foundation for critical thinking

Papers

The discipline of critical thinking An IES strategy report

Experiences of a critical thinking approach in engineering practice A 3-page IES Journal paper

Case Studies

Manufacturing robot cranes (page 27) A manufacturer uses critical thinking

Inventing a bionic hand (page 39)

Athena, godess of wisdom
Rodin's thinker

Critical thinking is interpreted here as the use of guiding principles that support the achievement of outcomes.

Critical thinkers discipline their minds to reduce the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes.

Guiding principles

Critical thinkers constantly look for guiding principles. They seek to identify and use the principles that will lead to success. Here are some guiding principles:

Actions

  • Test proposals - see Proposal testing below.
  • Reflect: question, review, consult, challenge, be challenged, expect to be challenged, be sceptical about the validity of all information; avoid preconceptions and bias.
  • Submit to reason: use logic and evidence to the limits of their potential before making informed judgements.
  • Use, where appropriate, the Engineer-it strategies
  • Think for yourself but not by yourself.
  • Adopt a system approach: consider the system as a whole as well as its parts.
  • Adopt a holistic approach: take account of all relevant issues.
  • Learn from successes and from failures.
  • If a feature can be quantified, quantify it: use predictive models, use data.
  • Monitor the results of actions and compare the actual outcomes with the intended outcomes.
  • Constantly seek to improve products and processes.

Seek to:

  • embrace integrity without question: honest, trustworthy, reliable
  • be humble, be prepared to change your mind.
  • be open, friendly, respectful
  • be committed
  • be collaborative, inclusive
  • be dispassionate about outcomes

Avoid being:

  • autocratic
  • deferential

Proposal testing

An appropriate amount of resouce should be allocated to testing of proposals for action. The amount of resource should be proportional to level of risk of negative outcomes.

Before accepting a proposal it should be tested:

  • taking account of all requirements, both objectives and constraints, addressing the complexity
  • against other proposals
  • using the most appropriate testing methods for the context
  • by a multidisciplinary team, if that is needed
  • by being open-minded, sceptical, not relying on intuition, avoiding bias
  • using reliable evidence and logic to the limits of their potential

Learning for critical thinking

The development of good habits should start as early as practical. That learning for critial thinking should start in primary school and be addressed continuously in education is becoming recognised. Critical thinking should be treated as a discipline in education i.e. as a branch of learning - see Section 4 (page 10) of the Discipline for critical thinking paper.

However, you cannot rely on being coached to be a critical thinker. People need to discipline their minds to develop critical thinking skills, Strategies for doing this include:

  • Be a student of crtitical thinking. Collect guiding principles. Write them down,memorise and use them.
  • Watch how other people operate and identify the principles that guide them to be successful. Discuss the issues with them. Add their good ideas to your list of principles.
  • Read about contexts where critical thinking was needed to identify principles
  • Identify the reasons for people to be unsuccessful. Actively avoid copying them.
  • Remember that some guiding principles are context specific. You are not using a set of fixed rules that result in success. You need to use critical thinking about your critical thinking strategies.
  • If you have a leadership role, work with your colleagues to develop the principles under which the team will operate.