Critical thinking: Difference between revisions

43 bytes removed ,  22:21, 2 December 2021
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
|}
|}
[[File:Athena-2.png|alt=|left|thumb|160x160px|Athena, godess of wisdom]]
[[File:Athena-2.png|alt=|left|thumb|160x160px|Athena, godess of wisdom]]
[[File:Thinker-2.png|left|alt=|thumb|Rodin's thinker]]Critical thinking is directed towards achieving satisfactory outcomes by adopting guiding principles that support the achievement of the outcomes.      
[[File:Thinker-2.png|left|alt=|thumb|Rodin's thinker]]Critical thinking is interpreted here as the use of guiding principles that support the achievement of outcomes.        


Critical thinkers discipline their minds to reduce the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes.                               
Critical thinkers discipline their minds to reduce the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes.                               
Line 33: Line 33:


==== Actions ====
==== Actions ====
*Test proposals, critique, review: see [[Critical thinking#Proposal testing|Proposal testing]] below.
*Test proposals - see [[Critical thinking#Proposal testing|Proposal testing]] below.
*Reflect: question, consult, challenge, be challenged, expect to be challenged :be sceptical about the validity of all information; avoid preconceptions and bias.  
*Reflect: question, review, consult, challenge, be challenged, expect to be challenged, be sceptical about the validity of all information; avoid preconceptions and bias.
*Submit to reason: use logic and evidence to the limits of their potential before making informed judgements.
*Submit to reason: use logic and evidence to the limits of their potential before making informed judgements.
*Use, where appropriate, the Engineer-it [[Chapter 1:Strategies for engineered outcomes|strategies]]
*Use, where appropriate, the Engineer-it [[Chapter 1:Strategies for engineered outcomes|strategies]]