Risk: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Control of risk is a pervasive issue in engineered processes. All Engineer-it strategies contibute to minimisig the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes. This is known as ''risk mitigation''. | Control of risk is a pervasive issue in engineered processes. All Engineer-it strategies contibute to minimisig the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes. This is known as ''risk mitigation''. | ||
A common defininition of risk is: the combination of the likelihood of occurrence and the consequences of | A common defininition of risk is: the combination of the likelihood of occurrence and the consequences of a negative event i.e. a hazard. | ||
A process for controlling risk is: First, identify the hazard; then use mitigation measures in this order of preference: | A process for controlling risk is: First, identify the hazard; then use mitigation measures in this order of preference: | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
# Eliminate: Avoid using a scaffold; work from secure platforms on the inside of the building. | # Eliminate: Avoid using a scaffold; work from secure platforms on the inside of the building. | ||
# Reduce likelihood: Provide a barrier on the outside of the scaffold. | # Reduce likelihood: Provide a barrier on the outside of the scaffold. | ||
# Reduce consequences: personnel attached by a safety line. | # Reduce consequences: personnel are attached by a safety line. | ||
''What-if analysis'' is commonly used to identify hazards. The risk analysis team ask questions such as 'What if the control system fails?' | ''What-if analysis'' is commonly used to identify hazards. The risk analysis team ask questions such as 'What if the control system fails?' | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Formal approaches to risk control include: | Formal approaches to risk control include: | ||
Use of a [[wikipedia:Risk_register|risk register]] where the hazards are identified, quantified and mitigated | * Use of a [[wikipedia:Risk_register|risk register]] where the hazards are identified, quantified and mitigated | ||
* Hazard and operability analysis ([[wikipedia:Hazard_and_operability_study|HAZOP]]) - typically used for the design and operation of chemical plant. | |||
Hazard and operability analysis ([[wikipedia:Hazard_and_operability_study|HAZOP]]) - typically used for the design and operation of chemical plant. | |||
=== Safety-criticial systems === | === Safety-criticial systems === | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
==== Safety culture ==== | ==== Safety culture ==== | ||
A safety culture is where all involved in the enterprise constantly think about safety, act safely and suggest actions to improve safety. Democratic leadership is essential in a safety culture. A suggestion to improve safety made by any employee must be considered and, if appropriate, action is taken. The concept of whistleblowing is discarded. Those who make useful suggestions for improvement may be rewarded rather than vilified. | A safety culture is where all involved in the enterprise constantly think about safety, act safely and suggest actions to improve safety. [[Leadership|Democratic leadership]] is essential in a safety culture. A suggestion to improve safety made by any employee must be considered and, if appropriate, action is taken. The concept of whistleblowing is discarded. Those who make useful suggestions for improvement may be rewarded rather than vilified. | ||
If you visit a nuclear power plant, you will | If you visit a nuclear power plant, you will be introduced to the safety culture and be expected to act safely. This sitation also pertains if you visit a well managed construction site. | ||
The diagram below shows the dramatic reduction in accidents after a safety culture was adopted at the 2012 London Olympic Park. | The diagram below shows the dramatic reduction in accidents after a safety culture was adopted at the 2012 London Olympic Park. | ||
[[File:Safety-culture.png|left|549x549px]] | [[File:Safety-culture.png|left|549x549px]] | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 15 March 2021
Control of risk is a pervasive issue in engineered processes. All Engineer-it strategies contibute to minimisig the risk of unsatisfactory outcomes. This is known as risk mitigation.
A common defininition of risk is: the combination of the likelihood of occurrence and the consequences of a negative event i.e. a hazard.
A process for controlling risk is: First, identify the hazard; then use mitigation measures in this order of preference:
- Take action to eliminate it
- Seek to reduce the likelihood of the event
- Seek to reduce the consequences should the event occur.
For example, in construction site safety, the hazard of people falling from a scaffold may be mitigated by:
- Eliminate: Avoid using a scaffold; work from secure platforms on the inside of the building.
- Reduce likelihood: Provide a barrier on the outside of the scaffold.
- Reduce consequences: personnel are attached by a safety line.
What-if analysis is commonly used to identify hazards. The risk analysis team ask questions such as 'What if the control system fails?'
Formal approaches to risk control include:
- Use of a risk register where the hazards are identified, quantified and mitigated
- Hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP) - typically used for the design and operation of chemical plant.
Safety-criticial systems
The failure of a safety-critical system could result in loss of life, significant financial loss, damage to the environment, etc.
Safety-critical contexts arise in the development of drugs, in the flight control of aircraft, in construction of infastructure.
Safety culture
A safety culture is where all involved in the enterprise constantly think about safety, act safely and suggest actions to improve safety. Democratic leadership is essential in a safety culture. A suggestion to improve safety made by any employee must be considered and, if appropriate, action is taken. The concept of whistleblowing is discarded. Those who make useful suggestions for improvement may be rewarded rather than vilified.
If you visit a nuclear power plant, you will be introduced to the safety culture and be expected to act safely. This sitation also pertains if you visit a well managed construction site.
The diagram below shows the dramatic reduction in accidents after a safety culture was adopted at the 2012 London Olympic Park.
