1,351
edits
Strategies for system planning: Difference between revisions
Strategies for system planning (view source)
Revision as of 19:58, 14 April 2021
, 19:58, 14 April 2021no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Figure 1 shows some features of an engineered process. | Figure 1 shows some features of an engineered process. | ||
Key issues are ''competence'', i.e. the skills of those inolved and ''governance'', i.e. how responsility, authority and accountabiliy are allocated. | Key issues are ''competence'', i.e. the skills of those inolved and ''[[governance]]'', i.e. how responsility, authority and accountabiliy are allocated. | ||
Competence is shown as having two main components: | Competence is shown as having two main components: | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Whereas 'what you know' might be described in term of disciplinary expertise, ethos is 'how you think'. Ethos is a crtical issue in engineered processes. | Whereas 'what you know' might be described in term of disciplinary expertise, ethos is 'how you think'. Ethos is a crtical issue in engineered processes. | ||
[[Critical thinking]] may be the most important feature of an engineered process. | [[Critical thinking]] may be the most important feature of an engineered process. Critical thinkers identify and use guiding principles that lead to engineered outcomes. | ||
Deep collaboration within the project team with unswerviing commitment to the project goals are also a key features of an engineered process. | Deep collaboration within the project team with unswerviing commitment to the project goals are also a key features of an engineered process. | ||
Closely related to commitment is the requirment that the process is underpinned by professional integrity at the highest level. | |||